Photo and Video to be Rolled Into One

Now that you are planning your marriage it is important to consider your wedding video.  Doing the whole thing yourself may be a lot cheaper and even though the technology is superb when it comes to equipment as explained below, it is always better to find a pro to do the work if you need something really totally unique to keep as a memento. 

All pro wedding video Sydney based companies use state of the art equipment, the one thing that sets them apart is the standard of work that they do, and this usually is reflected by their qualifications and experience.  Your wedding video is going to be something that you will cherish over the years so it is important that the person doing the shooting has some good testimonials from previous clients. 

Marriage plans take time and therefore there is no actualneed to plunge into getting a wedding videographer Sydney based company, take some time and make sure that they’ll provide you with a brilliant production as a cherished souvenir.  If you decide that you are going to do the honeymoon and wedding video yourself, you may think about employing the Canon EOS 5D as it is a great camera for both videos and photos. 

Given the fantastic qualities that the Canon EOS 5D Mark II has, boasting a full 21.1 megapixel and an HD movie capacity ; one has to ask the question, if this is the point where photographers and videographers will be doing the same job.  Thinking about it, having only one kit for two purposes should be the ‘it’ gadget.  Considering that you do not have to hold heavy heaps of cameras, stands and lenses, having only 1 tiny camera should do the job.  But is it truly up to it?  Are we really into it? 

There is a fascinating convergence taking place though that’s being driven by the hardware makers.  Increasingly video capture is being found in all things from mobile phones and PDAs to dig cams.  Also, the cost of near-broadcast quality video gear has dropped to the point that cameras and revising systems that were the dream of creative film makers merely a short while back are now in reach of virtually everybody. 

Taking a useful photograph means telling a story in a single image.  Thru choice of subject, composition, focus, cropping and the like, the cameraman selects those things that she or he wants to convey the meaning intended, or not.  This is a demanding art as well as craft.  With film or video, motion pictures as they once were universally called, there is the added element of multiple viewpoints achieved thru editing, as well as sound.  A mood can be made.  A complicated story can be told.  The viewer’s perceptions and emotions can be manipulated to achieve the creator’s informative or emotional ends.  But this is peculiar, at least to the quality standard that we have set.  Most similar productions require 2, or 3, or more folk with specialised talents to do a similar thing. 

Nevertheless, even those of us with lesser experience and abilities can still find pleasure in producing short videos and still footage that can be creatively satisfying, and also even achieve wider recognition.  The point is that for some folks video production could be a very satisfying accessory to still photography, if not a real alternative.  And, with the new generation of high definition equipment which has just become available this year at down to earth prices, the visible quality of what can be produced is nothing short of amazing. 

So, will this be the medium of the future?  What will this be called?  What will you call the person that is both photographer and a videographer?  There is just so much difference that both mediums are arguing with each other which one is best.  Merging both will be difficult as it is confusing in a way that in an artist’s standpoint, a picture says more than 1,000 words silently than a video that announces everything in motion and in words. 

If I’m going to have my opinion, using just one piece of equipment for photography and videography should be best kept for the enthusiasts and beginners alike.  Professionals are keener on conventions ; they deserve to be left with what they are trained to do.  A should stick to his SLR, and a videographer stick with his video camera.  In exclaiming this though, the professional wedding videographer is drawn to the Canon 5D SLR only for its ability to supply wonderful video photographs, typically only seen in 100k and video cameras.  The only downside is, the SLR is essentially built for taking photos and not a lot of thought is given to the ergonomics and functionality for videos.  ( Perhaps with its popularity among film makers this will soon change ).  With the comparisons of differences and similarities, it is concluded that in this time, it still isn’t satisfactory for both parties to combine as a one job outline.  Maybe two more years maybe.